Quotable Quote of the Month

What does it take for Republicans to take off the flag pin and say, 'I am just too embarrassed to be on this team'?".- Bill Maher

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

E.J. Dionne Op-Ed: President Obama As An Alien


On 2/22, E.J. Dionne wrote the following article about the right's inaccurate portrayal of President Obama. Following the article is my commentary (in bold type).

By E.J. Dionne Jr., Published: February 22

They say that President Obama is a Muslim, but if he isn’t, he’s a secularist who is waging war on religion. On some days he’s a Nazi, but on most others he’s merely a socialist. His especially creative opponents see him as having a “Kenyan anti-colonial worldview,” while the less adventurous say that he’s an elitist who spent too much time in Cambridge, Hyde Park and other excessively academic precincts.

Whatever our president is, he is never allowed to be a garden-variety American who plays basketball and golf, has a remarkably old-fashioned family life and, in the manner we regularly recommend to our kids, got ahead by getting a good education.

Please forgive this outburst. It’s simply astonishing that a man in his fourth year as our president continues to be the object of the most extraordinary paranoid fantasies. A significant part of his opposition still cannot accept that Obama is a rather moderate politician quite conventional in his tastes and his interests. And now that the economy is improving, short-circuiting easy criticisms, Obama’s adversaries are reheating all the old tropes and cliches and slanders.

True, some of this is driven by cable television (a venue in which I acknowledge regularly participating). Attacks designed to gin up the conservative base are quickly recycled to gin up outrage within Obama’s own base. Moreover, Obama is not the first president caught up in the rank unpleasantness of this particularly unforgiving political moment. A quick Google search will unearth references to George W. Bush as a “Nazi,” and Bill Clinton’s Republican opponents went so far as to impeach him in a shameful episode of extreme partisanship.

On those Hitler metaphors: Can we please agree to a voluntary cross-party ban on invoking the Fuhrer in the context of American politics? Only dictators who commit genocide against millions qualify for this odious comparison. It trivializes Hitler’s crimes to use Nazi references as everyday epithets.

But there is something especially rancid about the never-ending efforts to turn Obama into a stranger, an alien, a Manchurian Candidate with a diabolical hidden agenda. Are we trying to undo all the good it did us with the rest of the world when we elected an African American with a middle name popular among Muslims?

In my experience, even Americans who voted against Obama were proud that our nation showed friend and foe alike that we are a special place. We know it’s wrong to judge people by their race or lineage, and we so value religious freedom and openness that we elected a Christian convert who is the son of a Muslim father and an agnostic mother to lead us at one of our most difficult moments.

Yet many in the anti-Obama camp just can’t stop themselves from playing on fears that electing a man who defies old stereotypes was a terrible mistake. Thus did the Rev. Franklin Graham assert Tuesday on MSNBC not only that Muslims regard Obama as “a son of Islam” (because his father was Muslim) but also that “under President Obama, the Muslims of the world, he seems to be more concerned about them than the Christians that are being murdered in the Muslim countries.” Graham slightly softened his comments on CNN Wednesday, but it remains troubling that he chose to turn a legitimate concern about the persecution of Christians into a slander.

In the meantime, Republican presidential candidates want to take a disagreement over whether and how contraception should be covered in plans issued under the new health-care law and turn it into a war against religion itself. “Unfortunately, possibly because of the people the president hangs around with, and their agenda, their secular agenda — they have fought against religion,” declared Mitt Romney, who pursued a similar line of attack in Wednesday night’s debate.

It’s another breathtaking slander to label Obama’s choice as an attack on religion altogether — and I say this as someone who strongly opposed the president’s initial decision not to offer any accommodation to religiously affiliated institutions on contraception. And how strange it is that Obama’s critics imply that he’s a Muslim and also condemn him as a secularist. He must be terribly clever — maybe it’s that fancy education of his — to be both.

As for Obama as a socialist, ponder two numbers: 13,005, which the Dow Jones average hit this week, up from a low point of 6,547 in March 2009. Some socialist.

We are blessed with the freedom to say whatever we want about our president. But those who cast Obama as something other than one of us don’t understand him and don’t understand what it means to be American.

E.J. is absolutely right. In an effort to downplay the heated rhetoric directed at President Obama, I've heard people on the right say that some of our previous presidents (namely Clinton and Bush 43) also faced fierce attacks. Although that's true, comparing what they endured with what President Obama has faced is an example of false equivalency. Here's why:

Prior presidents didn't have their U.S. citizenship scrutinized.

They never had their patriotism questioned on a continued basis, if at all. 

Their religious faith wasn't called into question

Also, we aren't just talking about the garden variety kook hammering away at a computer keyboard or a blowhard pundit shouting into a radio microphone/TV screen. No, a lot of these attacks are coming from prominent GOP politicians. People who actually have a shot at becoming the next POTUS!  

If anyone still wants to say the attacks against President Obama aren't any worse than what previous presidents have faced, I'd love to hear your arguments.

On the 2/24 installment of Politics Nation with Al Sharpton, E.J. Dionne and former RNC chairman Michael Steele discuss these continued attacks on President Obama.



5 comments:

Josh said...

I'll say they're not worse.

They're different.

Obviously an Obama supporter is going to view it as worse. But no president is treated the same.

You only have to go on what you have to go on.

One of the arguments that makes me laugh is that "Bush didn't have to put up with..." line.

News flash: they're not the same person.

I think being blamed for 911 is more than having your patriotism questioned. I think having the mainstream media willingly run a false war story is questioning your patriotism.

But I'm not going to rant down the line about this criticism vs. that criticism, about being labeled a fascist vs. a socialist, because they're obviously going to be different.

And folks who believe the moon landing was hoaxed aren't necessarily the same folks who think McCartney is a clone.

But here's my tear for poor, poor Obama and those meanies who won't weave him awone. :'(

dmarks said...

"Their religious faith wasn't called into question"

You can thank the Hillary Clinton campaign, not "The Right" for making the "Obama is a Muslim" idea a big meme in the first place.

And yes, the equivalency is a lot closer than you think. For example, on "Prior presidents didn't have their U.S. citizenship scrutinized."

The left wing version of this is the silly meme that Bush didn't even win the election. Both the birther thing and this are harebrained hoaxes that equally call into question (or attempt to) the President's legitimacy. And with both, there's a persistent minority of loons on each side who believe one or the other is true.

Josh: Good points all. Bill Clinton got rake over the coals no less than his successor, as well.

okjimm said...

The attacks, in the uber radical right wing, on Obama are, ah, funny. They smack of high-camp posturing more than fact or rational opinion.

I was once considering becoming a Muslim.... but was told I would have to give up bratwurst. That sealed the deal.

Dave Dubya said...

I don't recall any president having a finger stuck in his face by someone saying they were "threatened" by him.

I also don't recall any president being called a liar during the State Of the Union speech.

I also don't recall any president being interrupted 50 times by a prime time interviewer.

I also don't recall any president being accused of "apologizing for America".

I also don't recall any president a being accused of instituting "death panels".

I also don't recall any president being called anti-American.

I also don't recall any president being feared as the anti-christ.

Just what the heck is so different about this president, anyway?

Malcolm said...

Josh: Me being an Obama supporter has nothing to do with it. The fact that there are responsible conservatives/Republicans such as Jeb Bush and David Brooks speaking out against the heated rhetoric from the right against President Obama is a clear sign to many that a line has been crossed.

You say you think Bush's patriotism was being questioned in the two examples you gave. However, some of President Obama's critics aren't leaving room for any doubt: they have said outright that he hates this country.

There are two ways in which Bush and Obama are the same: they are both American Christians. Why do you think after 4 years, the citizenship and religious affiliation of the latter is still being questioned?

dmarks: Nice try. Although Hillary Clinton's campaign did look into then-candidate Obama's citizenship, they dropped it (like any sane person would) when they found out he was born in the United States. It's people on the right who still don't believe he was born here!

Assuming you are talking about the controversy surrounding the 2000 Bush/Gore election, it doesn't even come close to the birther conspiracy.

I acknowledged that previous presidents have gotten lambasted. As long as the criticism is policy-related, I don't have a problem with it (even if I may disagree). However, there is a certain level of nastiness to some of the attacks against President Obama that's hard to ignore. Why after all this time, do you think people are still questioning his citizenship and religion?

Okjimm: Thanks for stopping by. I have to laugh at some of the right-wing nonsense directed at President Obama myself. If they think it's a winning strategy, good luck to them.

Give up bratwurst?! I don't blame you!

Dave Dubya: I posted this in a rush before heading off to work so I only scratched the surface with my "false equivalency" argument. Much appreciation to you for filling in the holes. Although I think the examples you listed are indefensible, I know there are some righties who will try to explain them away.