tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post3370272899091654109..comments2023-10-24T04:47:49.032-04:00Comments on Progressive Soup: Fox "News" Once Again Exhibits Common NonsenseMalcolmhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02065814455731328574noreply@blogger.comBlogger28125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-35186819239812463242013-09-27T18:50:25.856-04:002013-09-27T18:50:25.856-04:00dmarks: And the truth is that I banned you from my...<i>dmarks: And the truth is that I banned you from my blog for using profanity in your comments.</i><br /><br />That isn't "the truth", it is a lie. I never used profanity on your blog. Everything else you said is also not the truth. (for a truthful account of what actually happened, <a href="http://www.w-dervish.blogspot.com/2013/02/saying-goodbye-because-im-going-to-be.html" rel="nofollow">see here</a>). That dmarks continues to peddle his lies everywhere he can has convinced me that HE is a pathological liar.Dervish Sandershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-73329389521726047022013-07-14T09:38:02.128-04:002013-07-14T09:38:02.128-04:00And the truth is that I banned you from my blog fo...And the truth is that I banned you from my blog for using profanity in your comments. <br /><br />Before this, I deleted your comments because you used immature insults (like a typical troll). When you got angry and lost control and started to swear, DS, I decided never to post any of your comments again.<br /><br />When you then decided to try to post scores of comments in which all you did was talk about member genitalia, I was vindicated that my decision was correct.<br /><br />When you boasted of faking people's IDS in order to get comments on my blog, I knew I was dealing with a pathological liar. Oh wait. I knew that already.dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-38850596071592561582013-07-14T09:34:46.553-04:002013-07-14T09:34:46.553-04:00Oh I agree about Common's lie about Bush not b...Oh I agree about Common's lie about Bush not being a call for Bush's assassination. I think I said it before. Regardless, here it is again: Fox was wrong to imagine a threat out of Common's line.<br /><br />-------<br /><br />"I am not a troll. I posted no comments containing profanity to dmarks' blog. I never "ranted about the length of [my] penis". These are lies."<br /><br />You did both. The penis length spams numbered in the many dozens, Dervish. You even admitted making these spams to "show" me what spam is like. You should apologize for it and not lie about it.<br /><br />"He says a Black man can "bash" another Black man for being Black"<br /><br />Any person if any color can make racist statements about anyone of any color. It is racist for you to excuse (and thus support) racial hatred by giving people a 'free pass' due to their skin color.<br /><br />"Bbush should have been convinced when the IAEA told him Iraq had no WMD PRIOR to the invasion"<br /><br />There was no evidence to convict bush. The International Criminal Court said this more than 100 times. In fact, there was not even enough evidence to warrant a trial.<br /><br />"but at least he admits he was "wrong" now, unlike dmarks."<br /><br />I stick to the facts: Saddam Hussein was stockpiling WMD. I would be a liar if I said otherwise. If Bush is lying, then it is about there <i>not</i> being WMD.<br /><br />I read the Wikileaks reports summarized in Wired, and other reports previously.<br /><br />"In regards to people like dmarks, FactCheck says, "we suggest ridicule". "<br /><br />The FactCheck report is rather out of date. The Wikileaks evidence might cause them to revise it.<br /><br />"Indeed, that is all these claims warrant"<br /><br />Only if someone wants to lie, as you are. And ignore evidence.dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-21697361022700604972013-07-01T15:12:58.236-04:002013-07-01T15:12:58.236-04:00I am not a troll. I posted no comments containing ...I am not a troll. I posted no comments containing profanity to dmarks' blog. I never "ranted about the length of [my] penis". These are lies. Also, I have been banned from three Conservative/Libertarian blogs, but these three people are all buddies who stick together, so it really only counts as one banning. See <a href="http://www.w-dervish.blogspot.com/2013/05/brookings-intellectually-honest_31.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> for the truth regarding the first banning (from the blog of an individual named Will Hart), and <a href="http://www.w-dervish.blogspot.com/2013/02/saying-goodbye-because-im-going-to-be.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> for the truth regarding why dmarks banned me from his blog.<br /><br />dmarks' narrative regarding Toure is indeed false. Also ridiculous. He says a Black man can "bash" another Black man for being Black. This makes no sense at all. Another false narrative that dmarks sticks to is that WMD was found in Iraq. According to the link Malcolm provided, "the ISG report was sufficient to convince the Bush administration that there were no WMDs to be found". bush should have been convinced when the IAEA told him Iraq had no WMD PRIOR to the invasion, but at least he admits he was "wrong" now, unlike dmarks. In regards to people like dmarks, FactCheck says, "we suggest ridicule". Indeed, that is all these claims warrant.Dervish Sandershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-8508980937405041522013-07-01T06:35:46.982-04:002013-07-01T06:35:46.982-04:00Dervish Sanders: Thanks for stopping by. You calle...Dervish Sanders: Thanks for stopping by. You called it correctly about dmarks referring to the old weapons as WMDs. I've gone back and forth with him on the Toure thing and as I see above, he's still at it.<br /><br />dmarks: If this doesn't convince you there were no WMDs, nothing will:<br /><br />http://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/no-wmds-in-iraq/<br /><br />As for the Romney incident, Phillip Maxwell (who took part in the bullying) confirmed that it happened around the time this story surfaced last year. The victim (John Lauber) has been dead for years and thus was unable to come forward. Romney's response to the accusation wasn't much of a denial. Considering the specifics given of the incident (holding someone down while you cut their hair), I don't believe Romney when he says he didn't recall it.<br /><br />http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/11/us/politics/years-later-a-prep-school-bullying-case-snares-romney.html?_r=2&<br /><br />Also, it wasn't just MSNBC who ran with the Romney bullying story. I believe that most (if not all) the major news outlets covered it. If one wants to debate whether or not what Romney did in high school is relevant today, I can understand that. However, by all accounts, it did happen. <br /><br />You're also distorting Toure's comments about Herman Cain. What he was saying is that there are people who are still threatened by what they perceive to be predatory black sexuality. I could post a URL to the clip here, but it would be pointless. You have your false narrative on Toure and you're sticking to it. Malcolmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02065814455731328574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-35924374378845604542013-07-01T05:42:11.301-04:002013-07-01T05:42:11.301-04:00WD is lying here on many things. The existing WMD ...WD is lying here on many things. The existing WMD in Iraq were prohibited by the cease fire agreements. The old weapons were usable, and were WMD and were outlawed. The accusers of Romney refused to come forward... if they ever existed. Toure did in fact bash Cain for being a typical black sexual predator. He is also a troll who has gotten banned on many blogs.... from mine for posting dozens of profanity-based comments per day in which has ranted about the length of his penis.<br /><br />"Common" did indeed lie. Bush told the truth.dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-49921346153822097192013-07-01T00:53:32.201-04:002013-07-01T00:53:32.201-04:00Romney bashed a fellow student because he was perc...Romney bashed a fellow student because he was perceived to be gay. The story was TRUE. It was confirmed by multiple people, as I recall. Apparently this is a "bashing" dmarks is willing to excuse? Romney was a bully when he was young, and a bully as an adult... when he shut down companies and stole worker's pensions. An all-around bad guy.<br /><br />BTW, I also do not know what MSNBC host dmarks is referring to as "Cornholio".Dervish Sandershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-48169225124375938052013-07-01T00:43:36.092-04:002013-07-01T00:43:36.092-04:00Malcolm: Also, do you believe that weapons of mass...<i>Malcolm: Also, do you believe that weapons of mass destruction were found?!</i><br /><br />He does. I have debated dmarks on this topic before and therefore know he is referring to old buried barrels of chemical weapons. But bush scarred people by referring to "mushroom clouds". bush was talking about nuclear weapons or missiles or usable chemical weapons, not useless degraded chemicals in buried barrels.<br /><br />dmarks is wrong about Common lying. Common told the truth. <a href="http://w-dervish.blogspot.com/2013/05/intellectual-honesty-concerning-ex.html" rel="nofollow">bush lied about WMD</a>.<br /><br /><i>Malcolm: Also, simply using the N-word in lyrics is not bashing black people.</i><br /><br />Agreed. But don't try to tell dmarks that. He <a href="http://www.w-dervish.blogspot.com/2013/04/severe-conservative-delusions-racist.html" rel="nofollow">thinks</a> the MSNBC personality (and African-American) Touré "bashed" Herman Cain for being Black. dmarks likes to imagine that Black people are bashing other Black people, or bashing White people. I can't think of even one instance when he complained about a White person bashing a Black person.Dervish Sandershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13671865801885224353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-79549138552587244972013-06-30T22:39:54.693-04:002013-06-30T22:39:54.693-04:00dmarks: Are you saying the Romney bullying controv...dmarks: Are you saying the Romney bullying controversy was fake because the story wasn't true? Also, who the hell is "Cornholio"?!Malcolmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02065814455731328574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-23701563643823009772013-06-30T22:34:15.941-04:002013-06-30T22:34:15.941-04:00Also, Malcolm said: " However, when members o...Also, Malcolm said: " However, when members of the media create fake controversies or disagree with President Obama simply because he’s a Democrat, that’s a problem."<br /><br />Yes, Fox News does this. And MSNBC creates fake controversies, and disagrees with Romney, and before him McCain,and before him GWB just because they are Republicans. And to you... that is no problem. Like the fake Romney Bully controversy which MSNBC ran with (host Cornholio really went nuts over it) and it evaporated: no substance.dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-39020618548252982642013-06-30T22:31:19.060-04:002013-06-30T22:31:19.060-04:00Teresa: Agreed
dmarks: "Refer to the Pew Tru...Teresa: Agreed<br /><br />dmarks: "Refer to the Pew Trust report, that shows MSNBC is really way deep in the tank for Obama. It is proven objectively, and this issue is settled now."<br /><br />Please note that my disagreement with "Kid" was in regards to what he said about the democrat media. He wasn't referring to MSNBC solely and neither was I.<br /><br />Also, do you believe that weapons of mass destruction were found?!<br /><br />"As for Common bashing black people using the N-word, it is not even discussed here."<br /><br />It's not discussed here because Fox didn't use it as a line of attack against Common. Also, simply using the N-word in lyrics is not bashing black people.<br /><br />Also, it's possible for a convicted murderer to be innocent of that charge. When looking at the evidence, I can see why Common feels the way he does. <br /><br />Finally, in regards to Common's so called "crappy music/poetry", how much of his work have you sampled to make such a judgement? Without looking it up, can you even name 5 songs by Common?Malcolmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02065814455731328574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-10518108793118955062013-06-30T22:07:56.013-04:002013-06-30T22:07:56.013-04:00Malcolm said: "However, your claim that the r...Malcolm said: "However, your claim that the rest of the media is in the tank for President Obama is false"<br /><br />Refer to the Pew Trust report, that shows MSNBC is really way deep in the tank for Obama. It is proven objectively, and this issue is settled now.<br /><br />"Killing over oil and grease, no weapons of destruc-tion."<br /><br />Common lied about then-current events, and betrayed nothing so outrageous. It's common currency in Washington. I don't see it as a call to kill him, myself. If Fox says it was, they are "unhinged" as well.<br /><br />As for Common bashing black people using the N-word, it is not even discussed here.<br /><br />Continuing with the REAL Common controversy, lets go to this sentence:<br /><br />" the fake Common controversy was also started because of his defense of accused cop killer Assata Shakur."<br /><br />Assata is a convicted murderer. She wasn't merely accused of killing the state trooper...<b>she was convicted of it, along with several other felonies, in a court of law</b>, and a fugitive felon. She actually went to kiss the ass of the worst killing tyrant in the Western Hemisphere, also. How can anyone defend this person? Well, a person like Common can, a person who lies about Bush and spews anti-black racist hate words in his crappy music/poetry.<br /><br />dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-74890728630838350752013-06-27T14:25:12.199-04:002013-06-27T14:25:12.199-04:00Malcolm: A few days? Seriously? Geesh! I can under...Malcolm: A few days? Seriously? Geesh! I can understand some of the shows focusing on it for 5-10 minutes over a period of a day but holy heck a few days is ridiculous. Total overkill IMO. Teresahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16040553825059591114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-85611310712223922262013-06-27T05:40:01.280-04:002013-06-27T05:40:01.280-04:00Teresa: In addition to the poem, the fake Common c...Teresa: In addition to the poem, the fake Common controversy was also started because of his defense of accused cop killer Assata Shakur. Many on the right took this to mean he's in favor of cop killing. That couldn't be further from the truth. The key word is "accused". The same goes for Casey Anthony. Right or wrong, many believed she was not guilty. This doesn't mean these people are in favor of child killing. <br /><br />Fox ran with this nonsense for at least a few days. I'm not sure if they dropped this "story" because it wasn't gaining any traction or if it was another reason. Malcolmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02065814455731328574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-74632194041363662322013-06-24T21:15:07.614-04:002013-06-24T21:15:07.614-04:00I didn't really see a problem with Common'...I didn't really see a problem with Common's poem. I may not agree with parts of it but that's no reason to say Michelle Obama should not have invited him to the White House. <br /><br />I'm not sure if there's more behind the so called controversy or not. Something about Common defending a person who killed someone? There are much more important issues to cover. <br /><br />Just wondering, how long did they cover it? Or how much, how often, and for how long? Teresahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16040553825059591114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-21615854040258889612011-06-07T12:50:04.114-04:002011-06-07T12:50:04.114-04:00Thanks for the link to your post about Fox News be...Thanks for the link to your post about Fox News being the problem. I read it yesterday and plan to comment on it shortly.Malcolmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02065814455731328574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-11593730701686946432011-06-06T19:10:48.451-04:002011-06-06T19:10:48.451-04:00Malcolm, I'd ask what lies but I don't wa...Malcolm, I'd ask what lies but I don't watch FOX so I have no way to discuss. Anyway, as far as my blog, <a href="http://ammajerkoff.blogspot.com/2011/06/fox-news-is-part-of-problem.html" rel="nofollow">How's This</a>Kidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05287399775879832602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-11226986677287284062011-06-06T12:15:54.401-04:002011-06-06T12:15:54.401-04:00Kid: You claimed that MSNBC went "on and on&q...Kid: You claimed that MSNBC went "on and on" about Michelle Obama's toned arms. That's different than articles being written about her arms. If MSNBC did go "on and on" as you suggested, one would think there would be video posted somewhere online.<br /><br />I am wary of news media in general and watch them all with a close and objective eye. However, Fox "News" is the target of most of my criticism. Not because they lean right, but because they claim to be "fair and balanced" when they are not and because of the misinformation/outright lies they spew on a regular basis. If MSNBC, CNN or any of the "big three" networks had pushed this fake controversy about Common's invitation to The White House, I would have called them out in this post too.<br /><br />Although you and I obviously disagree on many political issues, I give you credit for your comments about Fox. The question I have for you is this: Have you or would you criticize Fox as you did here on your own blog or another conservative blog?Malcolmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02065814455731328574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-89735483912879736082011-06-03T20:18:40.872-04:002011-06-03T20:18:40.872-04:00Hey Malcolm, Well, these articles don't stay o...Hey Malcolm, Well, these articles don't stay on the net forever, or for very long for that matter. You wanted a link, I sent a few.<br /><br />This was back when the Dems, with Obama in the lead, were ramming the health care bill down America's throat that 70% + (say 100) were against, and I was watching msnbc daily during that time cause they've got it on in the lunchroom at work, and not once did msnbc bring up these monumental issues. Or any for that matter. Nothing but feel good warm and fuzzy nonsense.<br /><br />Outside of Mathews and Olberman who are the left wing counterparts to Limbaugh and Hannity.<br /><br />'Michelle's toned Arms, was a literal, but it was also a euphemism about how the mainstream media refuse to take the Dems to task.<br /><br />Many times, it's not what the democrat media says, it is what they don't say. And it's still going on today. But I do still stand by my original comment that Fox news is for idiots. We're all being played.<br /><br />I'm not against you or any other citizen, I'm against government. Please Consider the more government gets involved in our lives the more screwed up they get. Both party's.<br /><br />All I'm sayin. The post was about Fox news - I wasn't going to stand by and let the MSM get off scott free is all. Live long and prosper baby.Kidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05287399775879832602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-90581109765503684932011-06-03T11:44:31.682-04:002011-06-03T11:44:31.682-04:00Many of the points in your last two comments have ...Many of the points in your last two comments have nothing to do with the topic of this post. As a result, I'm not going to address them. <br /><br />Thanks for the link about stories regarding Michelle Obama's toned arms. However, none of the stories you linked to were by MSNBC (the network you accused of going on and on about Michelle Obama's toned arms). The first story on the results page was a link to a CNN story from 2009 and most of other links were to articles in fitness/lifestyle magazines. In fact, one of the stories was by ABC and was about some of the criticism the First Lady has received because of her fashion choices. <br /><br />I see nothing wrong with news outlets doing puff pieces on public figures. They did the same thing with previous first ladies so any criticism directed at a news outlet doing a story on Michelle Obama’s arms seems like nitpicking to me. I think the point CC was making about Fox is that they devoted a lot of airtime to a fake controversy in yet another effort to discredit President Obama. <br /><br />Comparing what Fox did (the fake Common controversy) to the occasional puff piece by another news outlet about Michelle Obama’s arms is false equivalency. If you ever find evidence of any news outlet doing massive coverage on Michelle Obama’s arms, get back to me. <br /><br />At the moment, I don't know anyone in the service. However, I've had several friends and relatives serve our country in the past.Malcolmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02065814455731328574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-52232618438295659182011-05-31T21:18:58.164-04:002011-05-31T21:18:58.164-04:00Malcolm, First Off I respect your position/opinion...Malcolm, First Off I respect your position/opinion. <br /><br />It is too easy to find justification for any opinion at opposite sides of the spectrum these days which makes decision making and true opinions hard to come by. Therefore, I respect your opinion as much as my own. I just happen to subscribe to my own on this matter.<br /><br />Michelle’s Toned Arms <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=muichelle%20obama%20toned%20arms&hl=en&ned=us&tab=nw" rel="nofollow">Michelle's Toned Arms</a><br /><br />The Dem media deployed the main weapons pre-election. This is when vetting, and examination and questioning should have occurred. All I remember from these goofs was tingles going up Chris Mathews legs and the other guys dumbfounded trying to figure out what Barry's IQ was. (Since he won't release his grades, I think we can assume they weren't 4.0 or close)<br />Point being that these guys can say whatever they want now ! Obama is in office already and in his first two years, he and the moron Pelosi We must pass the bill so we can find out what's in it ! For a bill that takes over 1/6th of the US Economy! Wow! and the rest of the dems have rammed through every liberal dream they've had since LBJ. What's left? The Dem media could rake the Obama and the Dems over the coals from now through the next election and they haven't lost anything.<br /><br />You're right that Limbaugh, Hannity, and some others pound him with a hammer on a daily basis. But we're talking a few people that have been cast as 'radical right wing attack dogs' and not 90%+ of the Accepted Media which my accusation goes to.<br />(Con't)Kidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05287399775879832602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-22890036783397150652011-05-31T20:21:13.480-04:002011-05-31T20:21:13.480-04:00Kid: You are the first conservative blogger I'...Kid: You are the first conservative blogger I've ever heard openly condemn Fox "News". However, your claim that the rest of the media is in the tank for President Obama is false. Take MSNBC for example. I have heard plenty of criticism of President Obama on that network and not just from people like Joe Scarborough and Pat Buchanan. Liberals/progressives such as Rachel Maddow, Keith Olbermann, and Cenk Uygur have all been critical of President Obama at some point. However, their criticism is fair minded. I’d also say that conservative pundits such as Scarborough and Buchanan are objective with their criticism of the president. I think conservatives feel that if a pundit isn’t taking shots at President Obama on a daily basis (even if it contradicts their previous stance), they aren’t doing their jobs. <br /><br />Sure, President Bush took heat from the media during his time in office. However, it is nothing compared to what President Obama has faced. Over the last few years, the right-wing has been practically in lockstep by running with phony controversies or outright lies in an effort to destroy President Obama. Here are some of the lowlights:<br /><br />* They've questioned his patriotism, place of birth, and his religion<br /><br />* Ran with a false claim about the cost of his trip to India. <br /><br />I don’t have a problem with people criticizing President Obama on his policies. However, when members of the media create fake controversies or disagree with President Obama simply because he’s a Democrat, that’s a problem. <br /><br />If you are offended that anyone pays serious attention to the numerous so-called "Democrat media" which you listed, are you also offended by those who follow Fox? Also, when has MSNBC gone on and on about Michelle Obama’s toned arms? Please provide me with some links. <br /><br />C.C.: Like I often say, there is a difference between reporting news and creating it. I doubt if this is the last time we see this type of “reporting” from Fox and the rest of the right-wing media.Malcolmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02065814455731328574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-3454793692776784192011-05-30T19:11:17.468-04:002011-05-30T19:11:17.468-04:00CC, sorta like msnbc going on and on about Michell...CC, sorta like msnbc going on and on about Michelle's toned arms. ?Kidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05287399775879832602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-16250170685052550652011-05-30T14:52:14.948-04:002011-05-30T14:52:14.948-04:00Soo, what I'm hearing is that Fox news has run...Soo, what I'm hearing is that Fox news has run out of things to talk about that actually matter. I swear with all the problems going on this is the kind of stuff they choose to harp on about Obama?CC Solomonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13430554149106735210noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694026809022095167.post-10466988223570414502011-05-24T20:42:52.634-04:002011-05-24T20:42:52.634-04:00Know that I am ultra-conservative. In my opinion f...Know that I am ultra-conservative. In my opinion fox news is juvenile. I can't stand to watch it.<br /><br />The rest of the media are the democrat media however, willing to say anything to support obama. More importantly, it is what the don't report that is significant.<br /><br />Seriously, you can see how the democrat media Pounded on Bush everyday for 6 years. They continue to pound on anyone that even appears to be a conservative. For everyone else it is not only a free ride but a supporting cast.<br /><br />I'm offended that anyone pays serious attention to the Washington Post, ABC, NBC, CBS, msnbc(whoa..) the Christian Science Monitor, Al Reuters, not to mention the seriously rabid clown shows which comprise most of the rest of them.<br />Foreign 'news' sources are usually readable at least.Kidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05287399775879832602noreply@blogger.com